La jurisdicción voluntaria: una propuesta de nueva concepción, denominación y reordenación
Keywords:
jurisdiction, voluntary, unitary, discrepancies, divergences, controversies.Abstract
The author of this article defends the lack of homogeneity of the regulation of this institution, as a consequence of not having discovered the adequate pattern of its structuring: the existence of legal unions. It is these and not the voluntariness of their actions, which determines their existence as an independent jurisdiction from the ordinary one. It also advocates a revitalization of the figure of the Lawyer of the Administration of Justice, to take charge of the full development of this jurisdictional function.
References
ALMAGRO NOSETE, CORTÉS DOMÍNGUEZ, GIMENO SENDRA y MORENO CATENA: Derecho Procesal. Tomo I. Parte General. Proceso Civil (1). 1987 Tirant lo Blanch., págs. 43 y ss.
BANACLOCHE PALAO, J.: “La intervención de Abogado y Procurador en la nueva Ley de Jurisdicción Voluntaria”. En Nueva Ley de Jurisdicción Voluntaria. Madrid, 2015.
CORBAL FERNÁNDEZ, Jesús Eugenio, IZQUIERDO BLANCO, Pablo, PICÓ I JUNOY, Joan, “Los expedientes y procedimientos de jurisdicción voluntaria”, 2.016, Editorial Bosch
FERNÁNDEZ DE BUJÁN Y FERNÁNDEZ, ANTONIO: “Comentarios a la Ley 15/2015, de la jurisdicción voluntaria”, 2.016, Ed. Thomson Reuters Civitas
GONZALEZ GRANDA, Piedad: “¿Quo vadis, jurisdicción voluntaria” (La reestructuración parcial de la materia en la ley 15/2.015, de 2 de julio, de jurisdicción voluntaria), 2.015. Editorial Reus
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 jose luis del moral barilari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors authorize the reproduction and public communication of the full texts of their articles for the purpose of their inclusion in the Dialnet database, as well as in others necessary to guarantee the impact of the research works.
